🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

Based on recent research, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would require contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee earning moderate income pays about 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast that with what average American pays. I can name multiple clients that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When including these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of going through the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding of coverage by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer have access to workers' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a superior and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.