🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

It was necessary because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were large groups of ballots that came in after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible where election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump last year went for Zohran this year. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over half. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he does because then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That really was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. But overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on if the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.